Transform your movie-watching experience with intelligent analysis that reveals hidden layers, themes, and connections in your favorite films
"Cats," the 2019 film adaptation of Andrew Lloyd Webber's iconic musical, isn't just a movie; it's an experience – one that leaves you simultaneously bewildered and strangely captivated, like watching a fever dream unfold on a giant screen. This cinematic experiment, ambitious in its scope and bewildering in its execution, attempts to translate the theatrical magic of the stage show to the silver screen, resulting in a spectacle that’s more bizarre than beautiful.
The film follows Victoria, a white kitten abandoned in a London alleyway, as she navigates the Jellicle Ball, an annual gathering where a tribe of cats compete to be chosen by Old Deuteronomy to ascend to the Heaviside Layer and be reborn into a new life. "Cats," a musical fantasy, explores themes of acceptance, belonging, and the yearning for a second chance, all set against a backdrop of surreal visuals and familiar, albeit digitally enhanced, feline figures.
Technically, "Cats" is a mixed bag. The direction, helmed by Tom Hooper, struggles to find a consistent visual language, veering between unsettling close-ups of the "digital fur technology" and wide shots that showcase the elaborate, if somewhat unsettling, set design. The cinematography is equally erratic, sometimes beautifully capturing the atmospheric mood of the alleyways, and other times feeling claustrophobic and jarring. Performance-wise, the cast, featuring notable names like Judi Dench, Ian McKellen, and Jennifer Hudson, deliver committed performances, showcasing their vocal prowess, yet are often hampered by the uncanny valley effect of their digital fur. Hudson, in particular, shines with a heart-wrenching rendition of "Memory," a highlight that almost manages to transcend the film's overall oddness. The screenplay, adapted from the original musical, stays largely faithful to the source material, but the dialogue, already stylized in its poetic form, feels even more artificial in the context of the film's already surreal world. The music, of course, remains the film's strongest asset, with Webber's memorable melodies providing the emotional core of the narrative, even if the sound design occasionally struggles to balance the orchestral arrangements with the actors' vocals.
Narratively, "Cats" suffers from a thin plot and underdeveloped characters. While the stage show relies on spectacle and musical numbers to carry the story, the film struggles to translate that energy to the screen. The story structure feels episodic and lacks a strong central conflict, making it difficult to emotionally invest in the characters' individual journeys. While each cat gets a moment to shine, showcasing their unique talents and personalities, their stories often feel disconnected and ultimately contribute little to the overall narrative. The film touches on themes of acceptance and belonging, but these themes are often overshadowed by the sheer spectacle of the visuals. Despite Hudson's emotional performance, the film's emotional impact is ultimately diluted by its bizarre aesthetic choices.
"Cats" succeeds in showcasing the undeniable talent of its cast and preserving the iconic music of the original musical. Hudson's performance is truly captivating, and the set design, while unsettling, is undeniably ambitious. However, the film's reliance on the now infamous "digital fur technology" proves to be its biggest downfall, creating a visual experience that is more distracting than immersive. The thin plot and underdeveloped characters further exacerbate the film's weaknesses, leaving viewers feeling disconnected from the story.
"Cats" is a cinematic curiosity that is best approached with a healthy dose of skepticism and a willingness to embrace the absurd. If you are a die-hard fan of the musical, you may find some enjoyment in seeing it brought to life on the screen, but be prepared for a visual experience that is both fascinating and deeply unsettling. Ultimately, "Cats" leaves a lasting impression, not for its artistic merit, but for its sheer audacity and unforgettable strangeness.